Every bug written so you can fix it, not re-find it
One ticket per defect: ID, severity, exact environment (device, OS, browser build), numbered repro steps, and a screenshot or screen recording of the failure happening.
QA for apps built fast
Your friends clicking
around isn't QA.
A handful of people poking at the happy path will never find the broken session, the permission hole, or the flow that dies on mobile Safari. Dokime runs a structured QA pass built specifically for apps made with Lovable and other no-code and AI builders and hands you the bugs before your first real users do.
Lovable · Bubble · Webflow · FramerReports in 48H or less
DKM-1042
CriticalCheckout fails silently when coupon field is empty
Submitting the payment form without a coupon returns a 400 and no error is surfaced to the user. Reproduced 5/5 on iOS Safari 17.
- Status
- Reproduced
- Env
- iOS 17 / Safari
- Logged
- 14:02:18Z
Regression checklist
- Signup → email verification
- Stripe checkout on mobile Safari
- Empty state after first login
- Session persists on refresh
- Form validation messages
Example report shown for illustration — not a real client submission.
What you getBug reports Summary report Fix guidance Re-test
A deliverable you can work straight through.
Documented, ranked, reproducible findings.
Severity breakdown and a coverage chart
How many Critical / High / Medium / Low findings, which flows we tested, which we couldn't reach, and what percentage of your app was actually covered. No hand-waving about “we tested it”.
Fixes written for the platform you built on
Not “add server-side validation”. Which Lovable prompt to run, which RLS policy is missing, which Bubble workflow condition is inverted — guidance that matches how you'd actually change the app.
Verification after you ship the fixes
We re-run the affected cases and mark each ticket verified or reopened, so “fixed” means a second pair of eyes confirmed it — not that the error stopped showing on your machine.
Built for no-code builders
AI-built apps break in the same three places.
When you ship in a weekend, there's no code review, no staging, no one else who knows how the app fits together. The failures aren't random — they cluster around what happens when a generator rewrites something it didn't fully understand. We test for those first, then everything else.
- critical
Auth and sessions break after regeneration
You asked the AI to change the login page. It rewrote the session handling too. Now a refresh logs users out, or a signed-out visitor can load a page they shouldn't.
- critical
Database permissions are wide open or dead
Row-level policies get generated optimistically. Either every user can read every row, or your own dashboard returns an empty list and you assume it's a UI bug.
- high
Orphaned logic after edits
A field gets renamed, a step gets removed, and something three screens away still points at the old shape. It only fails on the one path you never re-tested.
PricingTIER-BASIC TIER-STANDARD TIER-COMPLEX
Take the complexity quiz — don't guess your tier.
Six questions about auth, roles, data and integrations. It takes two minutes and tells you what your app actually needs.
Basic
$200flat, self-serve
A single-purpose app or a tight MVP: one or two core flows, one account type, no payments.
- ›Up to 3 flows
- ›2 device/browser combos
- ›Full report + fix guidance
Standard
Custom quotescoped from your quiz
Multiple user roles, real auth, a database with permissions, maybe Stripe. Most Lovable apps land here.
- ›Full flow coverage
- ›5+ device/browser combos
- ›Permissions & auth deep pass
- ›Free re-test
Complex
Custom quotescoped from your quiz
Integrations, background jobs, webhooks, multi-tenant data, or anything where a bug costs money directly.
- ›Integration & webhook testing
- ›Multi-tenant isolation checks
- ›Load-shaped edge cases
- ›Ongoing release passes
Your first real users are the worst QA team.
They don't file tickets. They hit the broken signup, close the tab, and never come back. Find it first.